It has been said 'the errand of angels is given to women' (Emily H. Woodmansee) and I find myself on such an errand, even if it has been a long walk to find this phrase as indeed descriptive of my own endeavors.
Friday, May 13, 2011
A Calling, Home Teaching, Visiting Teaching
Last Sunday I was given my first 'Calling'. What does that look like? The Ward Bishop asked to speak with me, asked my husband if he would mind, to which my husband, with a big smile on his face, shook his head no and said go right ahead. Because my husband already knows how much of this works, he was amused, lovingly so, but amused nonetheless. The Bishop asked if I would agree to being called to be a Relief Society (R.S) Teacher (once a month, third Sunday, even numbered lessons). Ahh, sure, I can do that is what I said. He talked with me a while longer, and my questions for him were along the lines of being very new to these doctrines, I was very likely to be more off track than on track in 'teaching' anything. I have no wish to offend the sisters. He encouraged me with some instruction in how this church conducts situations in which 'discussion' is encouraged and some methods to ensure it remain gentle, loving discussion. Okay, so this is my new function in R.S. meetings, and I already envision the sisters teaching me more than I would be 'teaching' them. I'm both flattered and also mildly amused as this may be a gentle, loving method to get me up to speed in learning some of the doctrine of this church.
Tuesday night my husband went out with another male member of the church to complete 'Home Teaching Visits' to the families assigned to them. Better that he should write or talk of his own experiences, these are not new to him, new to me as his newly baptized wife, but not new to him at all.
Wednesday night R.S. President visited me at my home to help orient me to my new function (calling). There will be the usual formalities on a Sunday where it is announced and followed at some point by a process of 'setting apart'. My first 'teaching' experience will be this Sunday, using the manual/book the church uses and the lesson will be on tithing. How fitting since I still have personal issues to work through with the concept of tithing. She and I talked some about how I viewed tithing, especially in relation to my prior employment and the impact on families at lower end of economical scale, for which this county is particularly known. What is the difference between a church requesting a collection and a church requesting a tithing? Well, there is to be the crux of my 'teaching' this Sunday in giving this lesson.
She also asked me if I would be willing to be a Visiting Teacher. Home Teacher, Visiting Teacher ... I hear these words used frequently, and haven't figured out which is which, why, and functions. She explained that Home Teachers are male (priesthood) who visit the family and Visiting Teachers are women who tend to the women. I agreed to participate as a visiting teacher. Since we are located some miles from the town served by the Ward, and we are down to one vehicle temporarily, I had some concerns about time frames. She explains that the visiting teaching can be done by phone calls, letters, or home visits. Another sister who lives in our little village does her visiting teaching by phone calls.
Thursday night, we had Home Teachers visiting us at our home. Awkward as that feels to me, it went fairly well in that it was more of a get acquainted visit. I was pleased that both of the men have formal professions one as superintendent of the local school district, and the other a retired college counselor. I'm not going to say I was altogether comfortable with the visit, given some of the topics and at one point one made use of the word 'liberal' somewhat disparagingly. It quickly became clear though, that his intent was in a different direction related to his professional field, and perhaps not aimed at those of us who may hold and cherish our 'liberal' views. I wanted to be entirely honest and forthcoming in my belief set, the story of my husband's return and my reasoning for baptism into this church in sharing information about us with them. The discussion took on a respectful tone, a sharing that I found useful, and the discussion soon shifted away from topics that are not yet comfortable for me. As I explained, I am not a 'convert' in the traditional sense of the word and bring with me my own testimony of faith which is steadfast irrespective of the differences in doctrinal teachings. There are aspects of this religion that I much respect, and aspects that I am not likely to value as much. I prefer to set my own pace, and not be instructed as to what I need to or should believe, nor the manner in which to express my beliefs, although I see learning the Mormon vernacular and the symbolic definitions as relevant to shared communication. It was a good visit, and I think I shall appreciate their future visits as appreciable opportunities.
It has been an interesting week. I can feel myself softening a little, pulling down some of the walls. Given that my orientation to the LDS religion has been from an unfavorable vantage point from several directions, understandably I have adopted a somewhat defensive position. It does indeed appear that these are caring people who do have an interest in caring for one another. I'm not yet sure that the established methodology for how the members care for each other is in the best interest of the individual or the best interest of the organization. My thinking is that it is in best interest of the organization, rightly so, with the bigger challenge being addressing the individuals as to their best interests when those interests conflict with the organizational interests.
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Barbara B. Smith influence on Mormon Women at time of ERA
It helped me to read what Stephanie posted in eulogizing Barbara B. Smith. Her expansive description of the time in which Barbara Smith took office of President of Relief Society reflected a time of great inner organizational structural change in the LDS church. At the time of ERA, I knew little of Mormon faith, beliefs or culture, only that the LDS women were marching in lockstep to help defeat ERA. At the time I was not in the fullest sense of the feminist movement, but I was in a budding career and much interested in growth of recognition of equal wages for women who found themselves in the workplace (either by choice or economic circumstance). I recall my thoughts at that time of thorough surprise, puzzlement and even disdain in hearing that Mormon women were not in support of ERA. How could sisters not support sisters, I wondered. What was this peculiar belief set that permitted the women to hold to the status quo of too many characteristics on the economic and domestic frontlines belonging to a ‘man’s world’?
Perhaps Barbara B. Smith wasn’t as far off the mark as I believed at the time. Now that even Mormon women find themselves in the workplace, and not necessarily by choice, but by economic circumstance, women’s rights have taken a slightly backwards step forcing choices to multi-task as wife, mother, parent, and working woman. The ‘SuperWoman’ as it was thought we women could be in those years of the movement (1970’s n 198'0’s) has proven to be unrealizeable. Some role element suffers - be it the career, the parent, the wife. I now believe an economy that forces women into the workforce at the expense of raising their children has consequences for the woman and the children. Which is not to say it can’t be balanced and done well, but it takes enormous energy and superb help, not always readily or handily available.
Having said that, I also believe that an economy built on consumerism has worn out it’s welcome and revisiting what we ‘need’ instead of what we ‘want’ is timely. We may well find out that we need less consumerism and want more time to be in and with family.